CE Marking of Machinery

The Machinery Directive and The Machinery Regulation: Understanding the Key Differences Between EU Machinery Law Frameworks

Introduction

For many years, the Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC provided the principal EU legal framework governing the safety of machinery placed on the European market. Its objectives were to ensure a high level of protection for health and safety and to facilitate the free movement of machinery within the EU internal market. Experience gained from its application, combined with significant technological progress particularly in software, connectivity, and automation revealed limitations in the directive’s structure and scope.

As a result, the European Union adopted Machinery Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 on machinery, which repeals and replaces the Machinery Directive. The new legislation entered into force in July 2023 and will apply fully from 20 January 2027. This article explains the key legal and technical differences between the two instruments, based solely on official government and legislative sources.


1. Legal Form: Machinery Directive Versus Machinery Regulation

The most fundamental change is the legal nature of the legislation.

 

    • The Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC was a directive and therefore required each EU Member State to transpose it into national law. This resulted in differences in interpretation and enforcement across Member States.

    • Machinery Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 is directly applicable in all Member States and does not require national transposition. It is binding in its entirety and applies uniformly across the EU, reducing legal fragmentation and inconsistencies.

The European legislator explicitly identified divergent national implementation as a key reason for replacing the directive with a regulation.


2. Scope and Definitions

The Machinery Regulation retains broadly the same scope as the directive but introduces clearer and more precise definitions.

Notable changes include:

 

    • Use of the collective term “machinery and related products” to distinguish between machinery, safety components, lifting accessories, chains, ropes, webbing, and partly completed machinery.

    • Explicit recognition that software performing a safety function falls within the regulatory scope.

    • Improved clarity on the status and obligations associated with partly completed machinery, including documentation responsibilities.

These clarifications are intended to reflect modern machine designs, which increasingly rely on programmable and digital systems.


3. Addressing Digitalisation and Emerging Technologies

The Machinery Directive was drafted at a time when connected and software‑driven machinery was far less prevalent. The Machinery Regulation therefore introduces explicit provisions addressing these developments.

Officially stated objectives of the regulation include:

 

    • Addressing risks arising from digital technologies, including connected machinery.

    • Ensuring protection against situations where external interference could compromise safety-relevant control systems.

    • Accounting for machinery that incorporates self‑evolving or adaptive behaviour, including systems using artificial intelligence in safety functions.

These considerations are now embedded in the essential health and safety requirements, whereas under the directive they were largely implicit or absent.


4. High‑Risk Machinery and Conformity Assessment

Both the directive and the regulation identify categories of machinery requiring stricter conformity assessment procedures. However, the Machinery Regulation revises and reorganises these provisions.

Key differences include:

 

    • An updated list of machinery categories subject to mandatory third‑party conformity assessment.

    • Inclusion of machinery whose behaviour may change autonomously and therefore presents risks that cannot be fully assessed using internal production control alone.

Manufacturers must reassess their machinery classifications under the updated annexes of the regulation.


5. Substantial Modification of Machinery

The Machinery Directive did not clearly define when a modified machine should be considered “new” machinery. The Machinery Regulation resolves this uncertainty.

Under the regulation:

 

    • A substantial modification is defined as a change that may introduce hazards or increase existing risks.

    • Any person who substantially modifies machinery is treated as a manufacturer for the purposes of the regulation and must carry out a conformity assessment covering the modification.

This clarification directly affects refurbishers, integrators, and users who make significant changes to machinery already in service.


6. Documentation and Instructions for Use

The Machinery Regulation modernises documentation requirements.

Key changes include:

 

    • Allowing instructions and declarations of conformity to be provided in digital form.

    • Requiring manufacturers to provide a paper copy upon request at the time of purchase.

    • Requiring safeguards to ensure that safety‑related digital information cannot be altered without authorisation.

Under the directive, paper documentation was the default requirement.


7. Lifecycle Approach to Machinery Safety

While the Machinery Directive focused primarily on design and manufacture, the Machinery Regulation strengthens the lifecycle approach.

Manufacturers must now explicitly consider safety throughout:

 

    • Design and construction

    • Transport, installation, and operation

    • Maintenance and software updates

    • Decommissioning and disposal

This reflects the recognition that safety risks may evolve during the operational life of machinery, particularly where updates or modifications occur.


8. Transitional Arrangements and Application Dates

Important milestones established in the regulation are:

 

    • 29 June 2023 – Publication in the Official Journal of the EU.

    • 19 July 2023 – Entry into force.

    • 20 January 2027 – Date of application, at which point the Machinery Directive is repealed.

Until the application date, machinery may continue to be placed on the market under the requirements of the directive.


9. UK Context After Brexit

In the United Kingdom, the Machinery Directive was implemented through the Supply of Machinery (Safety) Regulations 2008. These regulations were preserved following EU withdrawal.

The UK Government has confirmed that:

 

    • The EU Machinery Regulation will apply in Northern Ireland under the Windsor Framework.

    • The UK government is updating the Supply of Machinery (Safety) Regulations 2008 to introduce similar measures to the EU Machinery Regulation 2023/1230, which will become fully applicable in January 2027. This update aims to clarify and future-proof the legislation, including the creation of common specifications, a move to paperless documentation, and obligations on all actors in the supply chain.


Machinery Regulation: Conclusion

The Machinery Regulation represents an evolution rather than a complete departure from the Machinery Directive. Its core safety principles remain intact, but the switch from a directive to a directly applicable regulation, combined with clearer definitions and explicit treatment of digital risks, significantly strengthens legal certainty and market consistency.

Manufacturers and other economic operators must adapt their compliance processes to reflect lifecycle safety, software control, and the clarified treatment of modified machinery. With full application in January 2027, early preparation is essential.


Formal Legislative Comparison: Machinery Directive vs Machinery Regulation

Aspect Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC Machinery Regulation (EU) 2023/1230
Legal instrument Directive Regulation
Legal effect Required transposition into national law by Member States Binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States
Objective Harmonise health and safety requirements for machinery to ensure free movement within the internal market Improve, simplify and adapt machinery safety rules; ensure uniform application and address technological developments
Application date Mandatory application from 29 December 2009 Applicable from 20 January 2027; repeals Directive 2006/42/EC on that date
Scope reference “Machinery” “Machinery and related products”
Coverage of software Software not explicitly regulated as a safety element Software performing a safety function explicitly covered within scope
Terminology structure Single overarching term “machinery” used broadly Differentiates machinery, related products, safety components, and partly completed machinery more clearly
Essential Health and Safety Requirements (EHSRs) Listed in Annex I Listed in Annex III with revised structure and additional requirements addressing modern risks
Digital and connectivity risks Not explicitly addressed Risks from external interference and digital connections explicitly addressed within EHSRs
Artificial intelligence and adaptive behaviour Not addressed Machinery with self‑evolving or adaptive behaviour explicitly recognised
Risk assessment obligation Required before placing machinery on the market Required, with explicit consideration of digital and behavioural risks throughout machinery lifecycle
High‑risk machinery list Annex IV identifies machinery subject to specific conformity procedures Annex I identifies categories of machinery requiring third‑party conformity assessment, revised from the directive
Conformity assessment routes Internal production control or notified body involvement depending on Annex IV Preserves conformity routes but revises applicability based on updated Annex I categories
Substantial modification Not expressly defined Explicitly defined; a substantially modified machine is treated as new machinery for conformity purposes
Responsibility for modified machinery Ambiguous; addressed through interpretation Person carrying out substantial modification assumes manufacturer obligations for modified aspects
Instructions for use Paper instructions required as standard Digital instructions permitted; paper copy must be provided on request at purchase
Declaration of conformity Paper declaration required to accompany machinery Digital declaration permitted, subject to accessibility requirements
Lifecycle consideration Focused primarily on design and manufacture Explicitly addresses safety throughout lifecycle, including updates and modifications
Market surveillance and enforcement Based on national transposed systems Reinforced through uniform application and alignment with EU market surveillance framework
Repeal provision Formally repeals Directive 2006/42/EC and Council Directive 73/361/EEC

 


Contact Safemach to discuss your CE Marking requirements.

Related Articles

The ultimate guide to PUWER to improve your understanding of the Regulation.

THE ULTIMATE GUIDE TO PUWER

PUWER (Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998) ACOP – L22 The Safemach Ultimate Guide to PUWER is a great resource for those who

Machinery Safety Standards

Key Machinery Safety Standards

We are often asked what are the key machinery safety standards, whether Harmonised to the Machinery Directive or Designated to the Supply of Machinery Safety

PUWER Inspections

Is PUWER necessary?

If your work equipment is listed in Regulation 2 of PUWER, then YES, you do need to carryout a PUWER assessment and the PUWER assessments